Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
 
OAR Certified Approver Program

Related Links

 Oversight, Analysis & Reporting

 VP for Research

 Sponsored Projects  Administration

 Sponsored Financial Reporting

 UM Policy Library

 Purchasing Services

 Training Services

 Controller's Office

 UM Home

 GMUN  

Electronic Tools


 FFN

 EGMS

 RSPP

 Data Warehouse

 Financial One Stop

 
Certified Approver Program > CA Exam Sample Questions

Certified Approver Exam
Sample Questions

 
These questions, dealing with direct charging, travel, and effort certification on sponsored projects, are taken from the full set of questions developed for part 1 of the certified approver exam. They are provided to give part 1 exam takers an understanding of the type of questions they will find on that part of the exam.
1. When charging direct costs to federally sponsored projects, it is generally ACCEPTABLE to:
a. Charge an expense exclusively to an award when the expense has supported only that award
b. Rotate charges among projects without establishing that the rotation schedule accurately reflects the relative benefit to each project during that specified period of time
c. Assign charges to a project on the basis of the remaining balance to resolve funding problems
d. Assign charges that are part of normal administrative support for awards
e. Both a and d
2. According to University policy, all of the following are ALLOWABLE travel expenses EXCEPT:
a. Baggage handling
b. Laundry/valet
c. Parking fees
d. Check cashing charges
3. Which of the following is true regarding signing effort reports?
a. Effort reports must be signed by the employee expending the effort or by someone with direct knowledge of all the employee's effort.
b. Signing the effort report confirms that the effort reported represents the effort expended by the employee during the quarter.
c. Retroactive changes are allowed after the report has been signed.
d. Both A and B
e. All of the above.
 
These questions are provided to give part 2 exam takers an understanding of the questions they will find on part 2 of the exam.

Part 2 is an 'open book' exam, so exam takers will have access to University policies and procedures, federal regulations, sponsor-specific regulations, the sponsor's notice of grant award, the University's Notice of Grant Award, the Proposal Routing Form, the proposal budget, the account setup information, and a set of transactions on which the exam questions are based.

1. Refer to the JE form marked Form C and the Request History marked Form C-1 (these forms will be provided in the packet of information the exam taker will receive at the exam site). Assume the original charge was made on 7/25/2000. Would you accept or reject this transaction? If reject, why?
a. Accept this transaction
b. Reject this transaction, because the justification provided is not adequate to explain why the cost transfer is necessary
c. Reject this transaction, because the cost transfer request did not include a justification for the delay in making the request
d. Reject this transaction, because the item was not included in the budget
e. Both b and c
2. Refer to the requisition form marked Form D and the Request History marked Form D-1 (these forms will be provided in the packet of information the exam taker will receive at the exam site). Would you accept or reject this transaction? If reject, why?
a. Accept this transaction
b. Reject this transaction, because the requisition form does not include the necessary signatures
c. Reject this transaction, because office supplies were not included in the budget
d. Reject this transaction, because there is no justification provided on the requisition form explaining why office supplies are being charged as a direct cost
 

Answers to Part I.:

  1. a.
  2. d.
  3. d.

Answers to Part II:
The correct answers to these questions depend upon the specific information provided on the JE and requisition forms and in the sponsored project case study.

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.